Project guide
Your job is not only to name a fallacy. Your job is to show exactly how the reasoning works,
explain what fails, and build a fairer version.
Want a warm-up first? Try the practice scenarios — nothing
is scored or saved.
The six-stage workflow
-
Stage 1: Choose
- Read the short definitions for several topics.
- Choose one that interests you and that you can explain clearly.
- Check the comparison guides if two topics seem alike.
-
Stage 2: Find
- Safe sources: teacher-provided texts, advertisements, product packaging or slogans, fiction, and approved public speeches or interviews.
- You may also invent an example modeled on a real pattern.
- Avoid private messages, arguments with classmates, comment-section fights, personal accusations, and long copyrighted passages.
-
Stage 3: Map
- Record the exact quotation and its source.
- Identify the claim or conclusion, the reasons, the evidence, and any hidden assumption.
- Note the context before and after the quotation.
-
Stage 4: Prove
- Do not write only "This is bandwagon."
- Name the exact sentence where the reasoning fails and say why.
- Explain what the evidence does and does not support.
-
Stage 5: Repair
- Preserve the speaker’s reasonable goal.
- Replace the flawed support with stronger reasoning.
- Change the original claim as little as necessary.
-
Stage 6: Cite and present
- Record the creator or organization, title, where it appeared, and a date if available.
- Include a direct URL for online material and a page, timestamp, or image number when useful.
- Choose a format that fits your assignment’s requirements.
Student analysis template
Copy these prompts into your notes, or use the printable
project planner.
- My topic:
-
- Source and exact quotation:
-
- Context:
-
- Main conclusion:
-
- Reason or evidence offered:
-
- Possible fallacy:
-
- Exact point where the reasoning fails:
-
- Could another label fit? Why or why not?:
-
- What additional context would change my judgment?:
-
- Why might this argument persuade someone?:
-
- A fair reconstruction of the intended claim:
-
- A repaired argument:
-
- Source citation:
-
Final project checklist
- ☐ I quoted the source accurately.
- ☐ I included enough context.
- ☐ I identified the conclusion.
- ☐ I identified the reason or evidence.
- ☐ I explained the flaw instead of only naming it.
- ☐ I considered a non-fallacious interpretation.
- ☐ I explained why the argument may feel convincing.
- ☐ I repaired the reasoning.
- ☐ I remembered that a weak argument does not automatically make the conclusion false.
- ☐ I cited the original source.
- ☐ My example is appropriate for school.
The site does not require any format. Pick one that fits your assignment.
- Annotated advertisement
- Before-and-after argument map
- Two-panel or four-panel comic
- Short narrated slide deck
- Mini-podcast script
- Infographic
- Dramatic scene with a repaired second version
- Museum-style exhibit card
- Comparison chart
- Case-file folder